Such a pedestrian question

The city is lively but not always liveable. Urban ambience can make one feel free, but polluted air leads to asthma and lung cancer. Car drivers or cyclists, family or industrialists: who does the city belong to? We talk greening cities on today’s episode of Standard Time.

City air  has dire consequences for our health and can inflict a wide range of diseases, including asthma and lung cancer. In 2019, polluted air led to 175,702 years lived with disability (YLDs) due to chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases in 30 European countries. The fine particulate matter resulted in 238,000 premature deaths. Urban traffic and energy consumption contribute vastly to climate change, and most of our infrastructures are not prepared to deal with the adverse effects of the climate crisis. 

There’s a lot of talk about car-centered cities, and how traffic needs to move away from individual vehicles toward greener options. With this discourse only just beginning to bud, the backlash is already in full force: populists are accusing environmentalists of hunting down drivers as if it were a matter of life or death. This topic is so charged because owning a car is not only a means to get from point A to point B, but it is a status symbol, a glaring emblem of class.  

Owning a car creates a form of entitlement to space, a privilege many are bereft of. However, access to a vehicle has been a class marker for a very long time and did not start with the invention of the combustion engine. In the novels of Honoré de Balzac, up-and-coming heroes have to develop entire schemes to keep their shoes clean – to avoid betraying themselves in high society, since they cannot afford a carriage. 

Across much of 20th-century Europe, traffic and commerce were considered of utmost importance in city planning. Infrastructure was developed to support individual drivers, often at the expense of public transport and communal spaces. Many are calling for a change. 

Green Urbanism envisions urban planning with communities and the environment at the heart of city design. It’s about reclaiming urban spaces for the people who live in them, promising to make these spaces livable not just for pedestrians, but for drivers too. European cities have been crawling towards this ethos for decades, intertwining greenery with architecture, and promoting public transport, cycle lanes, and walker-friendly spaces.

Architects, scholars, activists, and artists work on reimagining buildings as living, breathing entities that contribute to the urban ecosystem. It affects housing, traffic, work, as well as care, fun, and community.

However, the road to Green Urbanism is not without its bumps. Financial constraints, legal entanglements, and public awareness, or the lack thereof, pose significant hurdles. But the prize is worth the pursuit. Cleaner air, clearer waters, and a cohesive community are treasures that promise a richer urban life.

Today’s guests

Jessica Furseth is a freelance journalist from London who explores the city scene, uncovering the unique and captivating aspects of urban life. 

Adél Csűrök is a representative of the NGO From Streets to Homes, providing the Housing First method in Hungary.

Lina Mosshammer is the Co-Founder & CEO of Punkt vor Strich and a Policy Officer at Verkehrsclub Österreich. She’s spearheading initiatives in mobility solutions, striving for a gender-sensitive and sustainable approach to urban transportation.

We meet with them at the Bikes and Rails Housing Project in Vienna.

Creative team

Réka Kinga Papp, editor-in-chief
Merve Akyel, art director
Szilvia Pintér, producer
Zsófia Gabriella Papp, executive producer
Margarita Lechner, writer-editor
Salma Shaka, writer-editor
Priyanka Hutschenreiter, project assistant

Management

Hermann Riessner  managing director
Judit Csikós  project manager
Csilla Nagyné Kardos, office administration

OKTO Crew

Senad Hergić producer
Leah Hochedlinger  video recording
Marlena Stolze  video recording

Clemens Schmiedbauer video recording

Richard Brusek sound recording

Postproduction

Nóra Ruszkai, lead video editor
István Nagy, video editor
Milán Golovics, conversation editor

Art

Victor Maria Lima, animation
Cornelia Frischauf, theme music

Captions and subtitles

Julia Sobota  closed captions, Polish and French subtitles; language versions management

Farah Ayyash  Arabic subtitles
Mia Belén Soriano  Spanish subtitles
Marta Ferdebar  Croatian subtitles
Lídia Nádori  German subtitles
Katalin Szlukovényi  Hungarian subtitles
Daniela Univazo  German subtitles
Olena Yermakova  Ukrainian subtitles
Aida Yermekbayeva  Russian subtitles
Mars Zaslavsky  Italian subtitles

Hosted by the Bikes and Rails Housing Project, Vienna. 

Source

Report: Health impacts of air pollution in Europe, 2022 by European Environment Agency. 

Disclosure

This talk show is a Display Europe production: a ground-breaking media platform anchored in public values.

This programme is co-funded by the Creative Europe Programme of the European Union and the European Cultural Foundation.

Importantly, the views and opinions expressed here are those of the authors and speakers only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor the EACEA can be held responsible for them.

Published 7 March 2024
Original in English
First published by Eurozine

© Standard Time / Eurozine / Display Europe

PDF/PRINT

Newsletter

Subscribe to know what’s worth thinking about.

Related Articles

Cover for: The school as commons

Housing estates can accommodate many people, but they rarely bring residents together, creating instead an atomized mass of individuals. However, public space can be cultivated, even among blocks of flats. And the school can play a key role in creating a shared environment and civic involvement, as seen in the example of a project in Košice, Slovakia.

Cover for: Why abortion alone does not make women free

Why abortion alone does not make women free

Claire Potter in conversation with historian Felicia Kornbluh

Last year’s overturning of Roe v. Wade took abortion laws in the US back to the nineteenth century. But despite the enormity of the setback, the moment provides pro-choice campaigners in the US with an opportunity to widen their political aims.

Discussion